翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Thompson Township, Jo Daviess County, Illinois
・ Thompson Township, Kittson County, Minnesota
・ Thompson Township, Michigan
・ Thompson Township, Ohio
・ Thompson Township, Pennsylvania
・ Thompson Township, Seneca County, Ohio
・ Thompson Township, Susquehanna County, Pennsylvania
・ Thompson Transit
・ Thompson transitivity theorem
・ Thompson Trophy
・ Thompson Twins
・ Thompson Twins discography
・ Thompson uniqueness theorem
・ Thompson Usiyan
・ Thompson v Foy
Thompson v London, Midland and Scottish Rly Co
・ Thompson v Park
・ Thompson v T Lohan (Plant Hire) Ltd
・ Thompson v Vincent
・ Thompson v. City of Louisville
・ Thompson v. Johnson County Community College
・ Thompson v. Keohane
・ Thompson v. Oklahoma
・ Thompson v. Washington
・ Thompson Valley High School
・ Thompson Valley, Virginia
・ Thompson W. McNeely
・ Thompson Water
・ Thompson Water Aerodrome
・ Thompson Weeks


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Thompson v London, Midland and Scottish Rly Co : ウィキペディア英語版
Thompson v London, Midland and Scottish Rly Co

''Thompson v London, Midland and Scottish Railway Co Ltd'' () 1 KB 41 is an English contract law case, concerning the exclusion of liability. It was described by Lord Denning MR in ''George Mitchell (Chesterhall) Ltd v Finney Lock Seeds Ltd'' as part of "a bleak winter for our law of contract."〔() EWCA Civ 5〕 Although the same decision would not be reached today because of the application of the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977, English courts continue to assess on an objective basis whether reasonable notice has been given of terms and conditions so as to incorporate them in the contract.
==Facts==
Mrs Thompson slipped on a ramp while disembarking a train at 10pm, from Manchester to Darwen, and was injured. The train had pulled up just past the platform, and so the ramp she stepped out on was slippery. A special jury found the railway to have been negligent, and so Mrs Thompson sought damages for personal injury. She had been given an excursion ticket by her niece, which said ‘Excursion. For conditions see back’ which in turn referred to the Railway’s timetables and excursion bills. The timetables could be bought for sixpence said the tickets were issued on condition that holders ‘shall have no rights of action against the company .... in respect of .... injury (fatal or otherwise) .... however caused.’ A jury found that the company had not taken reasonable steps to bring the conditions to the notice of Mrs Thompson and awarded damages. But then the judge, as a matter of law, held that when the ticket was accepted the contract was complete, and so the jury was not entitled to find as they did. Mrs Thompson could not read.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Thompson v London, Midland and Scottish Rly Co」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.